Business Law #3: DQDUE DATE: March 20th (21:00 EST)!!PROMPT:Attached are some excerpts from the decision of the Michigan Court of Appeals in Able Demolition v. City of Pontiac. After you have read and thought about the Court’s decision, answer the following questions (SEE ATTACHMENT!!!):1) In your opinion, was the result reached by the courts “fair” in this case? Would you have ruled the same way as the trial judge and the appellate courts in this case? Why or why not? Explain your answers thoroughly.2) How do you think Able got itself into this mess? Do you think it just ignored the requirements of the contract, or was something else at play? If you think something other than ignorance must have been involved, what was it?REQUIREMENTS:-Entire answer will be AT LEAST 450 words. -Shows an excellent understanding and reflection of knowledge from the assigned discussion topic.-Incorporates reference to literature, outside readings, and personal experience to support comments using the correct APA format.-Contributes to discussion with clear concise comments formatted in an easy to read style that is free of grammatical or spelling error.-Should include a Minimum of TWO scholarly or professional sourcesMake sure that you ANSWER THE QUESTIONS CLEARLY AND CONCISELY. In that vein, the prompt will typically require you to consult the text material in order to formulate your answer. All written assignments will be checked using Turnitin.com which will generate an originality report. Each submission should contain no more than 20% unoriginal work (excluding your bibliography, in-text citations and assigned questions if used in the document). Proper APA format is required for this course which calls for both in-text citations and a reference page at the end of the document.